Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 17,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The submitted hardcover calculations do not differentiate the hardcover within the 75-foot setback area. <br /> In addition, the surveyor has not deducted the traveled bituminous road surface or the area beneath the <br /> road from the hardcover and lot area calculations as is required. Curtis noted that does not change <br /> anything with respect to this application per se and that the hardcover and structural coverage numbers are <br /> not increasing specifically, nor are they the primary subject of the application, but Staff recommends that <br /> the hardcover calculations be updated. <br /> Staff finds that the setback limitations on the property create practical difficulties in identifying viable <br /> expansion opportunities. The applicant has provided a relatively low impact solution to the stated living <br /> space challenges which do not result in an expansion of structural coverage or of hardcover. The affected <br /> neighbor's views of the lake are currently impacted by the applicant's existing entry stair system; and <br /> with a one-story house, they likely do not have views of the lake impacted by the applicant's proposed <br /> bathroom addition. <br /> Staff received neighbor acknowledgement and support of this project. <br /> The Planning Commission should open the public hearing, receive any comments from the applicant and <br /> public, and then make a recommendation to the City Council. . <br /> The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff <br /> Julie Lensing stated she has nothing to add to Staffls report but would be available for questions. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. <br /> Leskinen asked if Staff could better explain where the expansion is going. <br /> Curtis displayed a picture of the house from the neighboring property. Curtis pointed out the proposed <br /> location of the addition. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant's architect did submit some sketches showing the second floor addition and the <br /> dark black outline depict the proposed new areas. Curtis indicated the bedroom addition will expand into <br /> the cantilevered area. <br /> Lensing stated currently the family room has a vaulted ceiling and the expansion will do away with the <br /> vaulted ceiling. The rounded windows will be removed and will be the start of the new floor. The new <br /> bathroom will be located above the stoop. <br /> Landgraver asked if there is any other way to expand to the sides or backwards. <br /> Lensing stated it is her understanding she cannot go sideways and she is not allowed to go forward. <br /> Landgraver stated a couple of months ago the Planning Commission denied a similar request but that in <br /> his view the small lot size makes this a unique situation. <br /> Page 19 of 43 <br />