Laserfiche WebLink
� ' 15-3731 <br /> Mey 13,2015 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> The property does not appeaz to meet the �mmum standards tor subdivision. It would be <br /> inconsistent with past city practice to allow credit towards the 2-acre contiguous dry buildable <br /> requirement far twa areas of�and sepazated by a 50-foot wetland carridor. <br /> Snmmary <br /> The goal of this review is to provide the developer with an overview of the perkinent City <br /> ordinances and how they affect the proposed plat, and to discuss the strengths and weal�esses of <br /> the proposal. The above memo reveals a numbex of items for consideration with the proposed <br /> plat and should provide direction to the developer regarding the plat. During the sketch plan <br /> review, the developer should advise whether any of the issues noted present particulax problems, <br /> sa that those issues can be discussed and the potential for approval or denial of variances to code <br /> standards ean be addressed by the Planning Cominission. Planning Commission shauld review <br /> each topic and identify any issues to which the developer should pay special attention. Similazly, <br /> if Planning Commission concludes that the Iand cannot be subdivided, the applicant should be <br /> made aware of that. <br />