My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
05-18-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 10:24:05 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 10:23:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Orono, MN Code of�rdinances Page 5 of 6 <br /> . <br /> division have been met.The city council shall determine the extent of density bonus awarded for such <br /> properties. Example: Properties guided in the Community Management Plan for a density range of <br /> two—four units per acre have a base density of two units per acre; while the high end of the density <br /> range is not guaranteed,the city council at its discretion may allow development at a final density of up <br /> to four units per acre through the performa�nce bonus process. <br /> (Ord. No. 67 3rd series, § 1, 1-11-2010) <br /> Sec. 78-1637. - Performance bonus requirements. <br /> Within the urban density area, developers have the opportunity to increase the base density by <br /> going above and beyond the Basic Conservation Design Master Plan requirement. By impfementing a <br /> combinatian of development enhancements that not on{y preserve but improve the natural <br /> characteristics of the properly or preserve and enhance existing landmarks,the developer shall <br /> become e[igible for a density�onus.The extent of such density bonus shall be determined by the city <br /> council. Development enhancements include but are not necessarily limited to the following: <br /> (1) Reforestation beyond existing woodland limits; <br /> (2) Water quality improvements; <br /> (3) lmprovements in ecological grade of existing communities; <br /> (4) Upgrading of edge buffering to maximum, or tunneled, character; and <br /> {5) Major preservation or enhancement of existing{andmarks. <br /> (Ord. No. 67 3rd series, § 1, 1-11-20'[0} <br /> D[VISION 4. - LONG-TERM PRESERVATION <br /> Sec. 78-'I638. - Preservation requirements. <br /> 7he developer shall establish and implement measures that will ensure the preservation and <br /> maintenance of those elements ofithe deve{apment that are determined ta require long-term or <br /> permanent protection firom development or misuse. Such measures may include but are not limited <br /> to: conservation easements; deed restrictions; private covenants;transfer of ownership to agencies <br /> such as the Minnesota Land Trust or the Nature Conservancy, or to the city via dedication, etc. <br /> {Ord. No. 67 3rci series, § 1, 1-11-2410} <br /> Sec. 78-1 fi39. - Buyer education. <br /> The developer shall establish covenants documenting the elements of the development to be <br /> protected and how they are to be protected, and shall establish a defined program for education of the <br /> initial purchasers of lots within the development as to the limitations that affect future use of the <br /> property. <br /> (Ord. No. 67 3rd series, § 1, 1-11-2010) <br /> D1VISlON 5.- RE50URCE5 <br /> Set. 78-1640. - Resources. <br /> The primary references for facilitating the conservation design process include the following: <br /> • Orono Rural Oasis Study(DSU, 2005). <br /> about:blank 5/15/20I 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.