Laserfiche WebLink
, , 15-3?20 <br /> 11 March 2015 <br /> Page 9 of 9 <br /> Summary of Issues for Discussion <br /> 1. Has the applicant demonstrated via the submitted Conservation Design Report and <br /> through other methods that there is justification for the proposed impacts to the Big <br /> Woods portion of the property? <br /> 2. Are the proposed design and preservation measures as proposed in the draft Covenant <br /> Docutnent (Exhibit G-6) adequate to protect the site environmental elements of <br /> importance? <br /> 3. Are there any other concerns that need to be addressed? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> 1. Applicant shauld be advised to address the items detailed in the City Engineer's comments. <br /> 2. Preliminary plat review should not move fozward untiUunless documentation is provided <br /> confirnung that the MCWD has approved.the wetland delineation boundaries. <br /> 3. It is recommended that specific driveway corridors for a119 of the easterly lots be shown on <br /> the preliminary plat drawing, as each site has trees, wetlands or topography that may impact <br /> or could be impacted by driveway locations. <br /> Planning Commission should hold the Public Hearing and receive comments from the public. <br /> Discussion of the above issues and any conclusions reached by the Planning Comxnission should <br /> provide applicant and staff with direction as to whether or how the proposed plat should be <br /> revised. Any xemaining topics left unaddressed to date should be brought up for discussion. <br /> Options for action include: <br /> - Table for further revisions and consideration(provide applicant direction). <br /> - Recommend approval or conditiQnal approval for the preliminazy plat. <br /> - Recommend denial, sta.ting reasons. <br /> - Other <br />