My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3203
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3200 - 3299 November 9, 1992 - June 23, 1993)
>
Resolution 3203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2015 1:06:33 PM
Creation date
12/29/2015 1:06:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.� <br /> ..r�' .> <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> �b_ - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �� G'�'F RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kESH�g'� NO. 3 2 0 3 <br /> B. The location of an oversized accessory structure <br /> on the property with doors facing towards detached <br /> garage require adequate area for maneuvering <br /> movement for heavy equipment and large truck , <br /> stored in oversized accessory structure. As a <br /> result, the structure cannot be moved further <br /> south or further away from the side lot line. <br /> C. The building envelope of the detached garage is <br /> not being expanded upon and the improvements <br /> invo lve mere ly structura 1 rep lacement of wa 11 s. <br /> D. The steep bank at the north side lot line was <br /> retained by the masonry Waii of the former garage. <br /> The pressures of the earthen bank weakened and <br /> • crushed the north wall of the garage. <br /> E. The property owner to the immediate north has <br /> submitted a letter to the City stating they have <br /> no problem with the boulder wall as instal led at <br /> the lot line by applicant. <br /> F. The 8' high wall functions as a gravity type <br /> retaining Wa11 and has not been approved by an <br /> . engineer. The City cannot approve the Wa1i as <br /> constructed recognizing it represents a safety <br /> risk and homeowner shall have the sole liability <br /> in the event of a failure. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br /> this property are peculiar to it and do not apply <br /> � generally to other property in this zoning district; <br /> that granting the variance would not adversely affect <br /> � traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property; would not <br /> merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or <br /> difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br /> • and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.