My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6567 - Recorded wo exhibits - see 6630
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 6500 - 6599 May 11, 2015 - March 14, 2016
>
Resolution 6567 - Recorded wo exhibits - see 6630
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 2:25:10 PM
Creation date
12/23/2015 10:06:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�O' ♦O <br /> CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �~� NO. b ") G1 <br /> l9kESH��� <br /> A7. The garage is proposed to be located 6 feet from the east side lot line. This is much better <br /> than the prior garage which was within a few inches of the lot line. Moving the garage to <br /> meet the 10' side setback would result in an unusable driveway entrance to the garage <br /> and require removal of portions of the existing deck. At 20 feet in width, the garage is as <br /> narrow as possible while still remaining functional for storage of two vehicles. <br /> A8. The Average Lakeshore Setback variance is necessary because each of the adjacent <br /> properties abut the 929.4' OHWL contour for Lake Minnetonka at the creek bank. The <br /> average setback line runs approximately east-west about 5 feet north of the north wall of <br /> the proposed garage, so the entire garage will be an encroachment. The property to the <br /> immediate east at 3407 Eastlake Street will have its lower views of Stubbs Bay <br /> encroached upon by the proposed garage. While the new garage will encroach lakeward <br /> approximately 9 feet less than the garage that was on the Property until 2011, the new <br /> garage as proposed will have a peak height of approximately 13.5 feet, while the old <br /> garage had an estimated peak height of 9.5 feet based on photos in City files. The <br /> proposed height is a reduction from the Applicants' original proposal, a direct result of <br /> the concerns expressed by the adjacent neighbor regarding views of the lake. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> B1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br /> and intent of the ordinance . . . ." The proposed variances to allow the construction of a <br /> detached garage on property zoned for single family use is consistent with the general <br /> intent and purpose of the Ordinance. <br /> B2. "Variances shall only be permitted... when the variances are consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan." Granting of the proposed variances to construct a detached garage <br /> to serve a single family residence is consistent with the residential guiding of this <br /> property in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> B3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br /> practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used <br /> in connection with the granting of a variance,means that: <br /> i. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br /> however,the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls." <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.