My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-14-2015 Councill Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
12-14-2015 Councill Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2015 10:02:41 AM
Creation date
12/23/2015 9:37:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1094
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 23 of 41 <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he would prefer to bring back a resolution that reflects exactly what the Council’s direction <br />is tonight. Gaffron stated what he currently has written is that road construction hours will be restricted <br />from 8:30 to 4:00 Monday through Friday, and when road construction is done, hours for house <br />construction are restricted from 8:30 to 4:00 Monday through Saturday. <br /> <br />Cornick stated in his view it would not make much difference. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she is in agreement with what Mr. Gaffron stated. <br /> <br />Cornick stated he would be in favor of Saturdays after road construction is completed. Cornick stated <br />there was also the issue with the Police Chief advising on the traffic. Cornick asked if there could be a <br />committee consisting of the Chief and a resident from Foxhill to make those decisions. <br /> <br />Mattick stated his concern is delegating decisions about public safety to a member of the public who does <br />not have the necessary knowledge and training required. Mattick stated he is not sure if it would make <br />sense to expand it beyond Police Chief Farniok. <br /> <br />Cornick stated it seems to be a lot of authority to be placed on one person and that it might be better to get <br />two opinions. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if it gets to be a problem, the Police Chief can approach the Council. <br /> <br />Walsh stated they could start with that and change it later if it problems a problem. <br /> <br />McMillan noted another proposed condition was the addition of speed bumps. McMillan stated once the <br />speed bumps are installed, they will likely not go away and will be permanent. There is also the question <br />of where to place them. <br /> <br />Printup stated if the developer is offering it, it can be in the resolution, but that they do not have to be <br />installed unless the City is approached by the homeowners association. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he is not sure whether the neighborhood wants them. <br /> <br />Levang stated speed bumps do create noise and that the City has had residents in the past saying they do <br />not want them located in front of their house. Levang cautioned the neighborhood to be very careful <br />about requesting them unless they understand the amount of noise they create. Levang stated there is also <br />the issue of whether they should be removed during the winter. <br /> <br />Walsh stated if they are requested, they should be provided, but that they should be the non-permanent <br />ones so it does not place an additional burden on the City when it comes time to plow. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the Council should just decide whether they should be installed or not. <br /> <br />Printup stated currently it is just a condition that is being offered and that the Council can either approve <br />or deny them if they are requested. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he will include language in the resolution regarding the speed bumps. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.