My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
11-23-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2015 9:27:47 AM
Creation date
12/23/2015 9:26:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Libby stated his point and premise is, in orchestration with Steve Brynes' remark, the Council does not <br />have enough information to make a prudent decision of governance based on the good of the many <br />outweighing the good of the few. Libby stated the City really needs more time to look at this and that in <br />particular they should ask whether Hennepin County has any authority for requiring the use of the Jacobs' <br />driveway. <br />In addition, the developer has never really educated the Council or brought forward the scope and <br />magnitude of these homes. Libby stated Mr. Steadman has mentioned to him that maybe they will not <br />build big houses. Libby stated someone does not invest a million dollars in a 3 -acre lot to build a small <br />home and that these houses more likely will be 12,000 to 16,000 square foot homes. Libby noted that <br />type of home is not built in six months and that the Foxhill residents are looking at a potential of three to <br />six years of open-ended construction activity consisting of roofing, concrete, flooring, and framing. In <br />addition, the construction will likely will require some type of crane construction. <br />Libby noted Heritage Lane already cannot accommodate the school bus passing a maintenance truck and <br />that it will be very difficult to traverse Heritage Lane if there are cars parked along the side of the road, <br />especially during the summer when the residents are parked there so they can access the dock. <br />McMillan noted the white house on Heritage Lane got torn down and rebuilt approximately eight years <br />ago and that their driveway was off of Shoreline. Hennepin County did not want the new driveway to go <br />onto County Road 15 and they told the City so. The City ended up keeping the driveway where it is. <br />McMillan stated Hennepin County makes strong recommendations on what they feel is right and that they <br />want the traffic properly managed. McMillan stated she does not want to get into what Hennepin County <br />says as being set in stone and that they make strong recommendations, which does not mean they cannot <br />be overridden by the City. McMillan stated when Hennepin County looks at this situation, they look at <br />the fact that Heritage Lane has a turn lane, which they deem as being safer. <br />McMillan stated the City respects what Hennepin County says about their roads and that the City respects <br />what other agencies have to say. McMillan stated she would like to leave it at that and not get into what <br />was said to whom. <br />Libby stated the statement that was made this afternoon by the Hennepin County authority was that the <br />statement contained in the e-mail is a standard response and it has no intrinsic specific application to 1700 <br />Shoreline Drive. <br />McMillan stated that is their response and that she will leave it at that. <br />Greg Coward, 1950 Heritage Lane, stated there have been two representations that he has wondered about <br />since he has gotten involved with this application. One was what the Mayor was just addressing. <br />Coward stated it seems to be that there is a difference between a Council saying it can be allowed versus <br />having it appear to everyone here in the audience that the County will not permit it and it is a done deal. <br />Coward stated if Hennepin County had refused access through the Jacobs' property, this would have all <br />been over months ago. <br />Coward stated the other issue is about the bluffs. Coward stated he never saw the platting of the ground, <br />and that when he heard about the bluffs, he assumed that the alternative road would have to go over the <br />bluff and then down into the area. Coward stated it was only afterwards that he found out that there were <br />Page 15 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.