My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
11-09-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 2:38:29 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 2:32:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 19, 2015 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 11 of 17 <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated the number of trunks is irrelevant and perhaps they should adjust it to take into account <br />the blocking factor of the trees. Schoenzeit stated if the living wall is blocking more than 50 percent of <br />the view, then it should be considered a nuisance. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated he would propose a height limit of six feet tall to help manage it. Landgraver stated it <br />is likely the City will have to hire someone to measure the trees. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated a nuisance is also the number of trunks, but if the stand of trees is mature and full, the <br />mitigation should be the height. Schoenzeit stated if someone removed every one out of three trees, the <br />view could still be mostly blocked and unimproved. Schoenzeit stated in his view the mitigation in that <br />situation is not sufficient, but if they are cut down to six feet, it would be improved. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated with the last version, a number of trees was not listed, and based on past direction, he <br />started with three trees. Barnhart asked if it is the expectation of the Planning Commission that a group of <br />three pine trees will get cut down at six feet. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated it depends on the blockage. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated that is where it gets fuzzy and that he has to write an ordinance that defines a living wall. <br />Barnhart indicated there is a fine line between a living wall and trees that block visibility, and that even if <br />the City does nothing, there will still be people out there that will plant trees based on their own goals <br />regardless of their relationship with their neighbor. Barnhart stated there are also situations where trees <br />are planted by nature or where someone stops maintaining them. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated if the intention is to impact their neighbors or someone did not really think about the <br />impacts, this ordinance will fix that, but if someone is looking for loopholes, they will find a loophole. <br />Barnhart stated the ordinance is very challenging from an enforcement standpoint and that he would be <br />cautious about being more aggressive on this type of ordinance. Barnhart stated if they look out in their <br />neighborhoods, they would likely find a living wall pretty quickly even if it was unintentional. Barnhart <br />stated he wants to avoid people coming in for a variance related to landscaping. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.