My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
10-25-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 2:29:01 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 2:23:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 08/19/15 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 08/21/15 <br />120-Day Review Period Expires: 12/19/15 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 22 October 2015 <br />Item No. 7 <br />Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section: <br />Name: Melanie Curtis mcc RJO Planning <br />Title: Planner <br />Item Description: #15-3781, Stonewood LLC., o/b/o Harry & Belle Yaffe, 3185 Casco Cir, Denial Resolution <br /> <br />Background: <br />At the October 12, 2015 meeting, the Council heard a variance request for an average lakeshore setback <br />variance in order for a four season porch to encroach lakeward of the setback line as well as lot area and lot <br />width variances. The Council voted 5 to 0 to deny the requested average lakeshore setback variance allowing <br />any encroachment. <br /> <br />The lot is substandard in area and in width. Typically the Code provision in Section 78-72 regarding a Lot of <br />Record would allow for the property to be redeveloped subject to 25% hardcover as well as conformance with <br />all zoning requirements and setbacks. Because the average lakeshore setback variance was requested, lot <br />width and lot area variances were also required. Because the average lakeshore setback variance was denied <br />at the October 12th meeting, the lot is considered a Lot of Record and no further variances are necessary in <br />order to redevelop the property. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends the Council consider the attached resolution reflecting denial of the average lakeshore <br />setback variance. Please note, redevelopment of this property will still require that the two separate parcels <br />be combined prior to issuance of a building permit for a home crossing the dividing property line. <br /> <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Council should consider adopting or amending the attached denial resolution. <br /> <br />List of Exhibits: <br />Exhibit A. Draft Resolution <br />Exhibit B. Draft Council Minutes 10/12/15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.