My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
10-25-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 2:29:01 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 2:23:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 24 of 37 <br /> <br />13. #15-3781 STONEWOOD ON BEHALF OF BELLE AND HARRY YAFFE, 3185 CASCO <br />CIRCLE, VARIANCES (continued) <br /> <br />Curtis stated she is not sure whether the patio was included in the initial plan, but because Staff was not <br />sure what was included, it is now shown in detail on the plans and on the survey. Curtis noted it is shown <br />on the left side or lake side of the property. <br /> <br />Cornick noted it is alleged that the fireplace in question was constructed without city knowledge or <br />approval. Cornick asked if the fireplace is illegal. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it was constructed without proper city permits and the property owner was notified at that <br />time that it was illegal. The City did not pursue removal of it at that time. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the neighbor’s patio has a railing. <br /> <br />Curtis stated it has a small wall around it that appears to be approximately 36 inches high. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if that would be considered structure. <br /> <br />Curtis stated technically they could meet the railing provision at the 36 inches. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the City does not allow patios higher than that within the average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />Curtis stated if it is elevated above grade 42 inches or greater, it would not be allowed without a variance. <br /> <br />Curtis displayed photographs of the patio and the fireplace. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the neighbor’s letter dated October 8 is different than what was presented at the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it is. Curtis stated the neighbor is not here tonight but her attorney is present and perhaps <br />could clarify it. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if there is a second story about the four-season porch. <br /> <br />Curtis stated it has a roof above it but to her knowledge it does not have any living space above it. <br /> <br />Gustafson stated nothing has changed in their design other than making the house smaller. <br /> <br />Levang stated the question is whether there is a practical difficulty for the four-season porch. <br /> <br />Sven Gustafson, Stonewood, LLC, stated he would like to explain how they arrived at the design of the <br />house. Gustafson stated as you approach the property, you come around Casco Circle, which drove the <br />decision to put the garage on the left side of the home. In doing that, that resulted in turning the garage <br />doors 90 degrees to the road. The home to the left has three garage doors that face the street. If they <br />went with a similar design, there would be six garage doors in a row. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.