Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 20 of 37 <br /> <br />9. #15-3774 MICHAEL STEADMAN ON BEHALF OF IRWIN JACOBS, 1700 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT (continued) <br /> <br />Cornick stated that is the type of thing the City needs to think of and do to the max for the residents. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he likes the suggestions made by Council Member Cornick. Walsh stated he is not sure the <br />residents will feel any better knowing that they could tear up their road with the construction traffic and <br />then tear it up again reconstructing it a few years later. <br /> <br />Walsh noted he did meet with Mr. Steadman and a number of the homeowners on the property. Walsh <br />stated in his view the temporary access road felt doable and that there is not a ton of trees that would get <br />damaged. Walsh noted the number of citizens affected in this situation is 46, with 17 children. Walsh <br />stated in his view it is a matter of not being able to get a road built but rather a matter of the developer not <br />wanting to. Walsh stated in some of the dialogue the parties did have some give and take and that he <br />knows the homeowners have said they have no problem creating the initial cul-de-sac since it is a 30 to <br />45-day project. Walsh noted Hennepin County has not denied access but has simply said they would not <br />allow it at this point. <br /> <br />Gronberg indicated they said they would never approve that versus the use of a public road. <br /> <br />Walsh stated that discussion is still waiting to be had since it has not been formally denied. Walsh stated <br />he is sure some of the homeowners would like to have that discussion. Walsh stated in his view the <br />neighborhood has done some compromise but that he has not really seen any compromise on the <br />developer’s side. Walsh stated there is no question this project will harm the neighborhood and that there <br />is not a good situation for everybody. Walsh stated he would not be in favor of it unless construction <br />goes through 1700 Shoreline Drive. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the temporary construction road would use the cul-de-sac, and if one of the lots is sold <br />where the temporary road is built, the developer would not be able to sell the southern lot until the <br />northern lot is built. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the neighborhood has said build the temporary access road and that it can be done but it is <br />not the perfect solution for the Jacobs. <br /> <br />Levang moved to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution for Application No. 15-3774, Michael <br />Steadman on behalf of Irwin Jacobs, 1700 Shoreline Drive, granting of preliminary plat for the <br />property located at 1700 Shoreline Drive. <br /> <br />Gaffron asked if the developer would be interested in providing some additional plans exploring the <br />option of not constructing the second cul-de-sac. Gaffron stated from a timing standpoint, the City does <br />have a 120-day review period that extends until the middle of November. <br /> <br />Gaffron asked what the developer’s time frame is on the project and whether he would be willing to delay <br />approval for a month. <br /> <br />Steadman asked if that is something that could happen at final plat. <br />