Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 12 of 37 <br /> <br />9. #15-3774 MICHAEL STEADMAN ON BEHALF OF IRWIN JACOBS, 1700 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT (continued) <br /> <br />The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Engineer have a safety expert provide a <br />review of traffic safety issues and address safety concerns such as ingress/egress to Shoreline Drive, <br />speed of construction, traffic on Heritage Lane, etc. The Consulting City Engineer’s office has indicated <br />they do not see any significant concerns and that construction work does not appear to impact any public <br />street. Gaffron stated the neighbors feel the construction will impact them due to the narrowness of the <br />road and have an impact on the quietness of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in front of the Council tonight is a significant amount of information, and if the Council is <br />looking for more definitive information, Staff can provide that. Gaffron stated the option that the <br />neighborhood would like access coming through the Jacobs property is not practical and Hennepin <br />County does not look favorable on that driveway serving as the construction access. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission did look at a number of documents that were provided by the applicant, <br />including a letter from a grading contractor who suggested that slopes in the range of 10 to 12 percent <br />would not be reasonable for a temporary construction access. There are some steep slopes and bluffs that <br />the developer’s engineer can address. Staff is not supporting or recommending a second access coming <br />from the south and in Staff’s view Heritage Lane remains the best access. <br /> <br />The applicant has discussed with Staff how the City determinations of building height and number of <br />stories rely on the use of existing grades. As a result, the revised grading plan shows that Lots 1 and 2 are <br />proposed to be graded to create building pads and establish new existing grades as part of the <br />development improvements. Those grades likely will not be established until the homes are being <br />constructed. <br /> <br />An updated Conservation Design Report was submitted prior to the September Planning Commission <br />meeting and is included in the Council’s packet. The Conservation Design Report states that the existing <br />drainage patterns will generally be maintained, the wetlands will be preserved and buffered, with the <br />exception of the small wetland within the Heritage Lane right-of-way, and a vegetation management plan <br />for the invasive species observed onsite will be implemented. <br /> <br />There will be tree preservation areas along the perimeter of the site, including the bluff areas. The trees <br />existing on the subject parcel range from poor to good health. The majority appear to be in good health. <br />Dead trees will be removed from the lots if they are within grading areas or if they pose a safety hazard. <br /> <br />There will be 110 trees removed for the construction of the extension of Heritage Lane and the new cul- <br />de-sac. Within individual lots, tree clearing will be avoided to the extent possible, but due to the lots <br />being located within the maple basswood forest, a certain amount of tree clearing will be unavoidable. <br />Building pad footprints have been selected to take advantage of natural clearings and existing flat grades <br />whenever possible. <br /> <br />Due to the proposed house locations within the forest, all positive views will remain, with the residences <br />protected from view by the large trees. The rolling hills onsite will further assist with the protection from <br />negative views. <br />