My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
11-09-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 2:01:02 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 2:00:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS (continued) <br />Erickson stated the developer is hiding the number of trees that they will be removing from the site and <br />that in his view it seemed a little bit misleading. <br />Erickson stated the fact that this parcel is a large parcel means that it needs more planning for the future. <br />The City should be looking at how that road will go through in the future and the impact that will have. <br />Erickson noted there has been no information submitted to substantiate the fact that the developer can <br />extend the sanitary sewer. Erickson stated he also submitted information on an alternate access. Erickson <br />stated he would appeal to the Council to ask those questions and obtain that information before moving <br />forward. <br />McMillan noted the Council and Staff did receive a copy of Mr. Erickson's report. <br />Matt Mithun, 1160 Heritage Lane, noted when the developer was asked to look at alternate routes, they <br />looked at a road going over the bluff, which they all know now does not make sense and that it would be <br />quite easy to use the existing road and achieve a 10 percent grade. Mr. Erickson also put together <br />information on an alternate road, which identified one tree that would have to be removed. The residents <br />were originally told 90 trees would have to come down if the alternate route were required. <br />Dennis Libby, 1000 Heritage Lane, stated he would like to go on record that he does change his opinion <br />and endorsement and acceptance of using the extension right-of-way to the cul-de-sac for primary access <br />to the development. Libby stated in his view the developer needs to have a different perspective on <br />providing the Council much more empirical data so the Council can make a prudent and wise decision in <br />their decision making. Libby noted he has twice heard the mayor ask the residents to discuss something <br />new and not talk about the same thing over and over again. Libby stated he would now like to talk about <br />something completely new. <br />Libby stated having been a resident of Orono and spending almost his entire life being a lakeshore owner <br />and having access to the lake, there is a part of this development that has never really been considered. <br />Libby stated as Staff and the Council look at this project from a long-term perspective, they will realize <br />the poorly conceived and completely unaddressed issue of the use of Tanager Lake for access to Lake <br />Minnetonka for these three lots. <br />Libby indicated he has been a real estate broker for 30 years and that he has had clients that reside and use <br />Tanager Lake. The Foxhill neighborhood has a fairly substantial, almost commercial size, dock on that <br />bay. The area the developer is proposing to use consists of intense habitat. Libby stated he has seen no <br />documentation on how that habitat and environment is going to be affected by the docks on Tanager <br />Lake. Libby stated in the words of the developer, these will be small boat tenders, but that people who <br />buy a 3.5 million dollar house likely will have big boats. Libby stated the homeowners association is in <br />compliance with everything the MCWD requires but yet the residents have not seen any plan concerning <br />this lake access. Libby stated Staff needs to address the conservation district, the impacts on that area, <br />and the developer needs to bring forward a proposal on how this makes sense. <br />Libby noted the Foxhill neighborhood uses Heritage Lane as their primary parking lane, which is <br />something the developer's traffic engineer completely ignored. Libby stated there is parking along that <br />street, which is a public street, and that they take steps to carpool to limit disruption to the public street <br />access. Libby noted the school bus and every 50 -foot long material transport truck will have a line of <br />residents' cars parked along that street. <br />Page 7 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.