My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
11-09-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 2:01:02 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 2:00:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />9. #I5-3768115-3780 MICHAEL AND LISA LARSON, 3569 SHORELINE DRIVE, TEXT <br />AMENDMENT TO AMEND B-1 ZONING DISTRICT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />(continued) <br />Levang stated she likes the plan and the use of the building. Levang commented it is an odd piece of <br />property in that the parking will be limited no matter what type of business is in the building. Levang <br />indicated she is in favor of the application. <br />Cornick stated he agrees with Council Member Levang. Cornick stated in his view there should be more <br />inspections than once a year and that there should be inspections two or three times a year. <br />Barnhart stated the Council can put any condition on the business if they feel it is appropriate. Barnhart <br />indicated he is comfortable with the City's licensing process, which is in place to help address the <br />concerns, but that the Council could put additional inspections on this business for the first couple of <br />years if they feel it is necessary. <br />Cornick stated he would like to see, at a minimum, additional inspections during the first year. <br />City Administrator Loftus stated the inspections typically look to see if the business is in compliance with <br />what was applied for and that the animals appear to be in good health and well cared for. Loftus stated <br />the inspector probably would not make much comment regarding noise during the inspection and that the <br />police department would handle any noise complaints. <br />Cornick stated other than the inspection issue, he would support what is before the Council tonight. <br />McMillan stated the inspections would also look at the cleanliness of the facility as well. <br />Printup asked where the 6 -foot fence is. <br />Barnhart stated there will be a 6 -foot fence around this portion of the property and then a 6 -foot fence <br />around the outdoor relief area. <br />Printup asked what is currently along the property line <br />Barnhart stated one of the conditions that Staff is recommending is that there be a 6 -foot fence located <br />along this area. Currently there is a chain link fence in that location and one of the conditions is to <br />replace it with a solid 6 -foot fence. <br />Levang asked if it would go all the way up the backside of the building near the Dairy Queen. <br />Barnhart stated he would not propose fencing there since the wall of the building would serve that <br />purpose. Barnhart stated he would also recommend the landscaping be cleaned up a bit. <br />McMillan asked if a taller fence would be helpful with noise and smells. <br />Barnhart stated the fence would be more visual but that he is not sure it would have a tangible impact on <br />the noise levels. Barnhart stated if the fence is taller than seven feet, then they would need to meet <br />building code requirements. <br />Page 16 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.