My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3344
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3300 - 3399 (July 12, 1993 - March 14, 1994)
>
Resolution 3344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2015 12:54:55 PM
Creation date
11/19/2015 12:54:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O � � <br /> � � �' � � CITY of ORONO � <br /> O :,, � � O . <br /> � � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> • '� ' ';b�:� '�'' �'� � <br /> �,� .Y .� �ti N0. a� � . . <br /> G <br /> �9�Es8�g'� . ' <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 20, <br /> 1993 and recommended approval of the variances as proposed based upon the <br /> following hardships or unique findings: <br /> A. The accessory structure has existed on the property for over 30 years prior <br /> � to current zoning standards. <br /> B . If the structure was to b.e moved to the south to meet the required street <br /> setback, steep elevations would require extensive filling. <br /> C. Both proposed additions to the accessory structure will meet the�required <br /> 10' side yard setback. <br /> D. The lot at 20,700 s.f. would �e allowed 15% lot coverage. The <br /> � applicant's unprovements are proposed at 2,557 s.f. or 12.3%. <br /> • E. The applicant proposes 138.4 s.f. of new structural hardcover and the <br /> . �removal of 720 s.f. of non-structural hardcover; over one-third of the <br /> hardcover removals are located within the 0-75' setback area. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered �this application�including the fmdings and � <br /> recoriiinendat'ions of the Planning Commission, reports by Ciry staff, comments � <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> .. • to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br /> . right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the . <br /> Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> • � � Page 2 of 6 <br /> � � . . � FarmSWS DiskOtono <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.