My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3329
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3300 - 3399 (July 12, 1993 - March 14, 1994)
>
Resolution 3329
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:24 PM
Creation date
11/19/2015 12:51:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I O <br /> � � CITY of ORONO <br /> O ;,� O <br /> ����"'=� ,� RESOLUTION ITY COUNCIL <br /> � �` ,�, A+ <br /> � <br /> �;,� �� _�� ��, NO. `�'' <br /> G <br /> �`9�ESH�g'� <br /> B. The adjacent neighbor to the north side of the subject property has already <br /> approved an addition to the accessory structure as long as it extends no <br /> closer to the shared lot line than the existing accessory structure. <br /> C. On December 14, 1992, Council approved Resolution No. 3213 that <br /> granted approval of the following variances for improvements to this <br /> property: <br /> 1) Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (D) - Approved street setback <br /> variance for oversized accessory structure proposed at 19' instead <br /> of required 30'. <br /> 2) Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Proposed structural <br /> improvements resulted in the need for a lot coverage variance <br /> proposed at 2,604.5 s.f. or 16.3% where only 2,384 s.f. or 15% <br /> is allowed. <br /> 3) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 -Average lakeshore setback variance <br /> approved for a lakeside addition that will encroach approximately <br /> 15' in front of the average lakeshore setback line. <br /> 4) Sectian 10.22, Subdivision 2 -Hardcover variances were approved <br /> within the 75-250' setback area. Hardcover was proposed at 3,386 <br /> s.f. or 30.2% where only 2,800 s.f. or 25% is allowed. <br /> 4. The City Council fmds that Lhe conditions existing on this prcperty are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br /> right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> Fam 5005 DhA da. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.