My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3310
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3300 - 3399 (July 12, 1993 - March 14, 1994)
>
Resolution 3310
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2015 12:46:49 PM
Creation date
11/19/2015 12:46:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o � <br /> � �' � CITY of ORONO <br /> O ,, . O <br /> • ��T� . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . <br /> � � +•� ���� �, NO. �e� e� � � .u. <br /> Y � <br /> ��9� o4�G <br /> Es8 . <br /> B. The lot was platted prior to present zoning standards. <br /> C. As a condition of the sale of the properiy, applicant has had to <br /> prematurely apply for variances prior to the resolve of the ownership of <br /> the soon to be tax forfeit properties to the immediate north. <br /> D. Applicant is unable to finalize comprehensive development plan for <br /> property and is fully aware that based on the limitations of lot depth that <br /> � she will need to file a rear/front setback variance application prior to <br /> � construction. <br /> E: Development of the lot would be consistent with the �pattern of <br /> development within the inunediate Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka <br /> Plat. - <br /> • F. The City readopts the fmdings set forth in Orono Resolution #3167 <br /> approving sanitary sewer service to the property. <br /> 4. The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely , <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property � <br /> � right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the communiry. , . <br /> . CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br /> Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby <br /> grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit � <br /> • � Page 2 of 5 ' . <br /> ro�soos a�o�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.