Laserfiche WebLink
�' ��' f ORONO <br /> O .� O _ <br /> CITY o <br /> �� ,� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> "'� � �"' NQ. � `��-' �� '�' � <br /> ''�+� ' � ~ti <br /> t��9 g�G � <br /> �CEgHO . <br /> 5. Prior to December 19, 1983, the Ciry Council always required that when two or <br /> more lots were owned in common, each lot must individually meet or exceed the <br /> requirements of the Zoning Code before any of the lots can be built upon and that <br /> two or more substandard lots owned in common must be combined so that the <br /> resulting combined lot meets the requirements of the Zoning�Code before the lots <br /> can be built upon. <br /> 6. Upon completion of a 6 month City wide review of the common ownership issue, <br /> on December 19, 1983, the City approved a policy change to permit all <br /> substandard undeveloped lots within the sewered areas of the City regardless of <br /> the ownership of these lots, the same standards for review. <br /> 7. The property is 16,748 square feet or 77% of the required area. The property <br /> is consistent in area with 7 other developed lots within a total developed <br /> neiQhborhood of 33 lots. <br /> 8. The property measures�55 feet in lot width, identical in width to two neighboring <br /> developed Iots but narrower than the majority of lots in the 33 lot Casco Circle <br /> neighborhood. <br /> 9. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 19, 1993 and <br /> � on a vote of 3-2 recommended approval of the variances as proposed based upon <br /> the following findings: <br /> A. No available land - lots are developed on both sides of property. <br /> B. Sewer and water are available to the property. <br /> C. A house and improvements can be consttucted without the need for <br /> additional variances. <br /> D. By granting this variance there will be no negative effect on the public <br /> health, safety and welfare. � <br /> E. By granting this variance it is consistent with the development of the area. <br /> � F. By granting this variance there should be no need for future hardcover and <br /> setback variances. _ � <br /> � . Page 2 of� � <br /> . ►..��o.. <br />