My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3588
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3500 - 3599 (November 28, 1994 - September 11, 1995)
>
Resolution 3588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2020 4:11:31 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 3:23:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O <br /> O O <br /> ti <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 9kESH0 NO. 3 5 8 8 <br /> A. The percentage of hardcover in the 75-250' zone will decrease from 4,213 <br /> s.f. or 52% to 4,120 s.f. or 51%. <br /> B. The proposed addition will have no impact on the views of the lake <br /> enjoyed by the neighboring property owner. <br /> C. The two-story addition will extend 2" closer to the north side lot line. <br /> The lot to the immediate north is undeveloped and serves as a lake access <br /> for an owner who resides to the immediate east. <br /> D. The City has received no negative comments from the neighbors notified <br /> of this variance review. <br /> E. The residence structure to the south is located 85' from the south side lot <br /> line of the subject property. <br /> F. There is more than a 100' separation between the Heit residence and the <br /> residence to the south. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br /> right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.