Pracitical Diff - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Letter View Practical Difficulties Documentation Form (1).htm[3/15/2018 1:13:32 PM] Response: Not applicable 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to suchproperty or immediately adjoining property. Response: 1. In 2001, the neighbor to the south at 2715 Casco Point Road, received a lake setback variance based largely on the hill from the main road to the home and the safety concerns outlined above. 2. The neighbor to the north at (2695 Casco Point) removed their home several years ago and the drainagewas modified (see survey for drain field). This has caused flooding problems and water runoff issues. Ourintentions are to re-shape drainage to better manage this situation and which would not be feasible if thehome were moved closer to the street in addition to the ?hill safety? argument. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which saidland is located. Response: Not applicable 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of asubstantial property right of the applicant. Response: We are replacing the existing home with a similar home, while improving the site for both neighbors. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort,morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The granting of the variance will not negatively impact the site, but will in fact make it safer and more suitable than its current condition. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but isnecessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: As discussed in #2 and in the narrative the shape of the lot and the steepness of the hill comingoff Casco Point Rd, it is necessary to keep the home at the proposed setback for the safety of the homeowners and guests coming and going from this home.