My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3520
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3500 - 3599 (November 28, 1994 - September 11, 1995)
>
Resolution 3520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:24 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 3:06:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-CATY of ORONO <br /> 11 <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> NO. 3524 <br /> 0g� <br /> permit per Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 19, 10.55, Subdivision 8 and <br /> 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the 5-8' high replacement retaining wall on the <br /> property, based on the following findings: <br /> a. The lakeshore lot has a steep sloping Lakeshore bank and at the top or <br /> ridge of the bank an old timber retaining wall had been installed sometime <br /> in the 1950's. <br /> b. At the site inspection in November of 1994, the City staff and City <br /> Engineer confirmed that the former wall was in a serious state of disrepair <br /> and needed to be replaced prior to the spring thaw and rains of 1995. <br /> C. The wall could not be replaced in the winter months because of the <br /> condition of the soils. <br /> d. If the wall was to fail, this would involve the major collapse of the <br /> applicant's lakeshore bank and the loss of several mature plantings. <br /> e. Existing mature plantings have been saved during the reinstallation of the <br /> second retaining wall providing screening from the shoreline. <br /> f. The wall has been installed per the standards set forth by the manufacturer <br /> and under the directives of the City Engineer. <br /> 4. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a <br /> fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as <br /> a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable <br /> hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br /> applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br /> and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the <br /> installation of a retaining wall will not be detrimental to the health, safety or <br /> general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> Form 5005 Disk Dram <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.