My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#2644 Recorded Resolution 4640
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Point Road
>
2617 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23-24-0035
>
Land Use
>
00-2644, VAR
>
#2644 Recorded Resolution 4640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2026 12:22:12 PM
Creation date
6/1/2026 12:22:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />to reduce some hardcover closest to the lake. A 14' X 14' four season <br />porch would be constructed in its place. The four season porch would <br />be located 105' from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. <br />C. The property was developed prior to the adoption of the zoning <br />ordinance. The house is approximately 1 O' from the side lot line at the <br />lakeside and is angled to a point where the house is only 2.85' from the <br />prope1iy line.. A second story addition has been designed to leave the <br />front ½ (lakeside) of the existing house to one story. Only the back ½ <br />(street side) would have a second story. This concentrates the massing <br />of the structure further from the lakeshore, and eases the burden of the <br />views from adjacent residences towards the lakeshore. <br />D. The overall lot coverage by structures decreases by 9 s.f. Most of the <br />massing has been relocated from the lakeside of the residence to the <br />street side to allow for the larger garage. For a lot coverage variance to <br />be approved an actual hardship must be demonstrated to allow the <br />increase in structure. The Council has in many situations allowed a <br />property to replace the total existing structure when remodeling. but it is <br />uncommon to allow a net increase when already exceeding 15%. <br />4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Page 3 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.