My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3500
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3500 - 3599 (November 28, 1994 - September 11, 1995)
>
Resolution 3500
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:24 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 2:51:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
04S)°4-0 sw, -_. CITY of ORONOO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 44,„ (::,,,.[::4,:>, I NO. 3 _. r 44 <br /> llesxo <br /> B. The post office has never had a formal parking lot and a formal parking <br /> lot with a drive through letter drop will eliminate the current pattern of <br /> parking on the shoulder of Brown Road. <br /> C. A parking lot meeting the requirement for being outside the 50' required <br /> free :d would ch into the existing Crystal lay park and <br /> playground area. An ingress:egress driveway would have to cross the <br /> front yard in order to reach such a parking lot. <br /> D. Construction and use of a parking lot meeting the front setback <br /> requirement would have a severe negative impact on the existing use and <br /> layout of the Crystal Bay park and playground area and further would <br /> require additional hardcover. <br /> There is existing screening to the south side of the parking lot which is <br /> appropriate as a buffer to the neighboring residence to the south. <br /> F. Construction of the parking lot will allow elimination of parking on the <br /> shoulder of Brown Road, resulting in a safer situation for post office <br /> customers. PIacement of the parking lot in a conforming location to the <br /> rear of the post office would likely result in continued unsafe parking on <br /> the shoulder of Brown Road. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission. reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the etrect of the proposed :•aria,,': on h.:aith. safct.•• and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions. light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property: would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant. but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br /> right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page ? of 5 <br /> m�Dist Om <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.