My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#2290 Denial Resolution - no number
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Circle
>
3235 Casco Circle - 20-117-23-43-0014
>
Land Use
>
97-2290, CUP
>
#2290 Denial Resolution - no number
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2026 11:08:21 AM
Creation date
5/28/2026 11:08:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application, the reports of the City <br />staff, the comments of the Planning Commission, and comments and written statements submitted <br />by the applicant. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota, hereby denies the conditional use permit application as described above based on one <br />or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property and application: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This property is located in the LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential District <br />and consists of22,420 s.f. or .51 acres where a minimum of (1/2) one-half acre is <br />required. <br />2. The subject property received multiple variances on March 10, 1997, for average <br />lakeshore setback, hardcover in the 75'-250' and 250'-500' setback and structural <br />coverage as set forth in Resolution #3 851. <br />3. The subject lot does not meet the minimum lot width requirements for the LR-lC <br />Zoning District. The minimum lot width requirement is 100' measured at the 30' <br />street yard setback. The subject property lot width at the 30' setback is <br />approximately 57'. <br />4. The Planning Commission voted to deny the application as proposed based on the <br />following findings: <br />A There are alternative design options for locating the garage and driveway that <br />do not require a conditional use permit. <br />B. The Commission has heard testimony from adjacent property owners and the <br />neighborhood regarding adverse impact. <br />5. In review of the factual findings noted above, the Council finds that granting a <br />conditional use permit to allow grading within 5' of the property line is not in <br />accordance with the objective of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Municipal <br />Plan. <br />Page 2 of3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.