Laserfiche WebLink
� �� � � � <br /> � O O <br /> b. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � :a4' <br /> �� L'�' . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � L�k'ESH�g'� NO. .s� C e) e� <br /> A. Applicant had no knowledge of the existence of the Conservation and <br /> Flowage Easement at the time of the sale of his property nor did his title <br /> company advise him of the easement. <br /> B. Applicant was not aware of the restrictive ordinances governing tree <br /> removal within 0-75' of the lake but has willingly agreed to replant a like <br /> number within the lakeshore protected zone. <br /> C. Erosion control has been maintained while lakeshore yard was in a <br /> disturbed state and absent of groundcover. <br /> 4 <br /> D. Jay Riggs, Environmental Specialist of Westwood Professional Services, <br /> Inc. has prepared a vvetland delineation report dated July 31, 1995 <br /> redefining the wetland area within applicant's lakeshore yard. The <br /> • findings confirm that the original conservation area defined in the 1978 <br /> • Conservation and Flov��age Easement was only partially involved with a <br /> v��etland. <br /> E. All disturbed areas have been replanted with suitable groundcover. The <br /> wetland area has been planted with Mn/DOT mixture 25 and the <br /> remainder of the disturbed yard located out of the newly defined wetland <br /> , area has been sodded. <br /> F. There are no signs of contamination or erosion witlun ihe marshlike <br /> ��etland adjacent to the shoreline nor of applicant's shoreline area. <br /> G. Section 10.�6, Subdivision 16(I) 2, would allow for clearing of vegetation <br /> to allo«� applicant to achieve a view of the shoreline. This was not the <br /> intent of the applicant as the main boal was to create a lawn within the <br /> l�l:eshore yard that could be maintained. � <br /> H. The nev��ly defined wetland area shall be allowed to be restored to a <br /> nahual wetland. <br /> • � <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />