Resolution 3653 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. 'i_.,�....._...... '__ .,.�_,...._.._W.�_._. ._..... .,. .,. ,a:. ...... . .......... .. .� .. . . ... ._�'. _. . . . . �. ' � � . , � . .. - 7 � O� O O • • �b. � h,CITY of ORONO ,� , �,, ti �� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � �kESH�4 NO. 3 6 5 3 WI�IZEAS, Lots 1-4 and Scotch Pine Lane will be replatted into three building lots and a private driveway outlot, with lot areas as follows: Proposed Lot 1 = 1.13 acres (Marfield) Proposed Lot 2 = 0.85 acres (Hill) Proposed Lot 3 = 1.34 acres (±0.96 acres dry) (Toles) Outlot A = 0.05 acres; and WIIEREAS, as a result of the replat, each of the three proposed lots increases in acreage gained from the vacation of Scotch Pine Lane, and in the case of proposed Lot 2, also resulting from the addition of area incorporated within the existing Lot 2. �ach of proposed Lots l, 2 and 3 will, however, remain at lot areas less than the required two acre minimum for the LR- lA Zoning District, requiring a lot area variance; and • WHEREAS, each of proposed Lots l, 2 and 3 are lakeshore lots but lack the required 200' lot width at the shoreline and at the 75' lakeshore setback line as required in the LR- lA district, requiring lot width variances for each of Lots 1, 2 and 3;_ and WI�REAS, proposed Lots 2 and 3 both abut North Shore Drive, a platted Counry road. Proposed Lot 1 as a result of the replat will no longer abut a public roadway, but will gain access via a shared driveway serving proposed Lots 1 and 2 within proposed Outlot A. By definition, proposed Lot 1 is a "back lot" per Municipal Subdivision Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 2. Per Section 11.31, Subdivision 5 (C-2), proposed Lot 1 is required to meet 150% of the two acre zoning district lot area requirement; is required to meet the 200' lot width requirement at the shoreline, at the lakeshore setback line, and at the street yard setback line; is subject to a street yard or front yard depth of 150% of the 50' front yard requirement of the LR- lA district; and is subject to a side yard depth of 150% of the 30' LR-lA side yard requirement; and �'�'HEREAS, as a result of the replat, the Marfield property (proposed Lot 1) becomes a back lot ��ith 4�' required side setbacks rather than the 30' side setbacks nornlally required in the LR-lA district, making more of Marfield's residence structure non-conforming to the side setback requirements. Similarly, the Hill property (proposed Lot 2) becomes a front lot subject to a �0' side street setback along Outlot A, and 30' side setback along the common • boundary line ��-ith proposed Lot 1. The replat results in revised setback requirements impacting proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3, which must be taken into account in future improvements to those properties; Page 2 of 6