My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3634
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3600 - 3699 (September 11, 1995 - March 11, 1996)
>
Resolution 3634
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 2:54:28 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 2:39:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> t9IfESH0 NO. 3634 <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 16, 1995 and <br /> recommended unanimous approval of the variances and conditional use permits as <br /> proposed and recommended approval of the comprehensive application based on the <br /> following unique findings and hardships: <br /> a. The eastern shoreline of West Arm is severely impacted by ice movement in <br /> the early spring. The bank at a 1:1 slope is unable to retain ground cover and <br /> is subject to severe erosion. <br /> b. The T treated timber retaining wall will provide a temporary solution to the <br /> erosion and will not address the issue of ice pressures on the shoreline bank. <br /> C. The installation of riprap would result in the loss of the natural sand beach <br /> along the shoreline. <br /> d. There is not sufficient depth between the shoreline and the lakeside of the <br /> residence to allow for the alteration of the bank to a 3:1 slope. The majority <br /> of applicants' lakeshore yard would be lost with the alterations. <br /> e. Applicants shall provide a matching excavation below the 931.5 elevation to <br /> offset 14.8 cubic yards of filling within the floodplain of Lake Minnetonka. <br /> f. The accessory structure will meet all required setbacks. <br /> g. The proposal will not result in an excess of structural coverage. Structural <br /> coverage will be maintained at 14.6% where 15% is allowed. <br /> h. The majority of hardcover within the 0-75' setback area at 907 s.f. is the <br /> residence structure and access stairs at 855 s.f. or 22.8%. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.