My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3672
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3600 - 3699 (September 11, 1995 - March 11, 1996)
>
Resolution 3672
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2019 9:51:13 AM
Creation date
11/18/2015 2:32:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
O O <br /> A b` <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> kESIID NO. -3672 <br /> 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 16, 1996, <br /> and recommended unanimous approval of the renewal variance as proposed <br /> based upon the following findings: <br /> A. Just over 16,0000 s.f. in area the combined lots contain substantial area <br /> • -,�.,,.r , <br /> iGr cc��strc:ct :�. of ;c sl:=6�.c f uy .� e .� v;ithr,u1 the r;,cl10irem-^nt of <br /> any additional variances to the zoning chapter. <br /> E. Municipal sever is available and assessed to the property. <br /> C. The combined lots meet the required lot width of the zoning district. <br /> D. Developed lot sizes in the neighborhood range from .14 acre to 1.5 acres <br /> of dry land, averaging about .55 acres. The combination of Lots 8 and <br /> 9 at .37 acre yield a lot size that. is not inconsistent with other lots in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> E. There is no other land available for purchase in order to make the lot <br /> size conforming. <br /> F. The City has granted previous lot area variances for this property in 1993 <br /> and 1994. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> /. a 1;. 11 fv n l+nr hl' fly �„ �,'1 t i�; ?(T1 11or rllFtC!(�}• that <br /> to 4 dull do lull apply y gcncrafll vt a... !: ot. r., in 1:..., c , <br /> granting the variance would not `adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.