My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3675
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3600 - 3699 (September 11, 1995 - March 11, 1996)
>
Resolution 3675
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 2:31:27 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 2:31:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
...- --�-_ ...- -- . . . . <br /> . ' . . � <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> � � �b. � CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> ti <br /> ��� ��'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � �kESII�4 NO. � � � � <br /> A. Registered Land Survey No. 617 was filed at the County on November <br /> 30, 1956 prior to the current standards for the development of residential <br /> property within the LR-1B Zoning District. <br /> B. There is no additional land adjacent to the property to combine with the <br /> parcel to create a confornung lot. <br /> C. The new residence will meet all other required standards of the LR-1B <br /> Zoning District and other pertinent sections of the zoning code. <br /> D. The final approved grading plan has co�rmed that the adjacent <br /> residences will not be impacted by runoff from the proposed residential <br /> construction. <br /> • E. The City has received no verbal or written objections to the proposed <br />, residential construction from the adj acent property owners. <br /> F. The width of the property is consistent with the widfli of the adjacent <br /> properties in the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br /> and welfare of�the community. � <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> . pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> � demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> � Page 2 of 6 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.