Resolution 3690 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. , : , ; � . . , � �� � � � ��b. - �� C ITY of ORONO � , � �� '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � ��kESH�g'� NO. :� �a � O -:� proposed subdivision configuration creates a "front lot" and a "back lot" per the definitions in the Subdivision Code (Ordinance No. 122, Second Series), and the newly created lots are subject to the lot area, lot width and structural setback standards of Subdi�rision Code Section 11.30, Subdivision 5 (C). This section would require the platting of an "access outlot" as a separate tax parcel adjacent to the "front lot" leading to the "back lot". 6. Section 11.30, Subdivision 5 (C) requires that the "access outlot" be 30' in width: That same Code section requires that the "back lot" contain 150% of the minimum zoning district required lot area. The LR-lA Zoning District required lot area is 2.0 acres. Under the proposed configuration incorporating the required 30' wide "access outlot", proposed Lot 1 (the "front lot") would contain 0.76 acres where a 2.0 acre lot area is required; and proposed Lot 2 (the "back lot") would contain 1.09 acres in area where 150% of the two acre standard, or 3.0 acres, is required. • 7. Proposed Lots 1 and 2 meet the 200' required lot width at all required locations with the exception that proposed Lot 2 is only 190' in width.at the street cettiack where a 200' width is normally required. 8. The property is within the Shoreland Overlay District and is subject to hardcover lunitations. The proposed "access outlot" is in the 75-250' zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed. Hardcover in the "access outlot" as proposed would be 35.0%, a 10% hardcover variance. The proposed construction on Lots 1 and 2 would not incorporate any hardcover into the 0-75' setback zone where no hardcover is normally allowed, but a variance for 28.8% hardcover where 25% hardcover is allowed would be necessary for the proposed construction on proposed Lot 1. 9. The proposed subdivision would create two extremely substandard lots from three existing record lots which individually are currently unbuildable without many variances. The three existing lots have historically been used as a single property. There are a number of non-conformities attributable to the existing lots: a. Each of the three existing lots is less than the required two acre minimum lot area requirement [Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B)]. • Page 3 of 9