Laserfiche WebLink
111b87.1 <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratooit� <br />DATE: November 13, 1987 <br />SUBJECT: Road Improvement - Woodhill Avenue <br />Public Hearing 7:30 P.M. <br />Attachments: A. Feasibility Study Dated 9/t3/87 - Follow-up <br />Letter Dated 10/13/87 <br />B. Agreement of Assessment and Waiver of <br />Irregularity and Appeal Dated 10/5/87 <br />C. Woodhill Avenue Project Progress Memo Dated <br />10/6/87 <br />D. Public Hearing Notice/Mailing List <br />E. Draft Resolution, Ordering Project <br />ISSUE <br />1. Holding of public hearing regarding proposed improvement to <br />the upgrade of Woodhill Avenue. <br />2. If deemed appropriate ordering in project. <br />3. Direct staff to establish elate for hearing for imposition of <br />the assessment when project completed. <br />INTRODUCTION - In order to pro,.4de appropriate access for the <br />Wooc�hi 11 plat, Woodhill Avent— needed to be upgraded to handle <br />the increased volume of t- _fic. As a result of this, a <br />feasibility study was under. ren to determine the approximate <br />cost. The range of the originial feasibility study had the cost <br />of the project between $50,700 and $61,680 depending on the <br />alternative selected. This has subsequently been amended as the <br />original feasibility study submitted by the Engineer was done in <br />advance of soil borings being done on site. Because of soil <br />borings, it was determiner] that additional expense would be <br />entailed in the project and the Engineer is recommc.iding a <br />revised alternative If with some relocation of the road as <br />alternative I is no longor cost effective. As a condition of the <br />subdivision approval adopted on September 23, 1987 was a <br />requirement that an agreement had to he reached with the <br />subdivider regarding their s':are of this project improvement. <br />Fol'.owing negotiations it was agreed that the developer and <br />Wooehi 1 1 Country Club would pay 75% of the t{-)tal cent based on <br />the original feasibi 1 ity study not to exceed 546,262. Between <br />she parties they agr:.-r,rl Wo(,Ihill would ahsorb 3/16 of the coe <br />and McDowell 9116. Ar suoh this represents 3 way for th(- special <br />assessments to he spread up t,) the maximum ont 1 ined above. <br />The City expedited its, cr,nsidl-r itjon and deterrination of th• <br />