Laserfiche WebLink
� { <br /> � O� . <br /> • O O <br /> �b. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � � � .. <br /> �� �'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � ��kESH�g'� NO. � � O � <br /> setback instead of the existing 16%, and said setback variances are further <br /> justified by the negative impact on room sizes and house layout if the <br /> variances are not granted, and the improved location of the residence in <br /> relation to lot lines provides further overall justification for the setback <br /> variances. <br /> F. A hardcover variances in the 0-75' zone is not justified since the removal <br /> of existing residence and deck allows for the replacement of a new house . <br /> and deck meeting the 75' lakeshore setback and therefore any hardcover <br /> in the 0-75' zone can easily be avoided. Applicant has not shown <br /> adequate hardship to justify placement of hardcover in the 0-75' zone. <br /> G. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is proposed to increase from 24.6% <br /> existing to 31% proposed by applicant. Moving the proposed house and <br /> deck out of the 0-75' zone results in a final hardcover (accounting for <br /> • reduced sidewalk length) of approximately 4,600 s.f. or 35.0% in the 75- <br /> 250' zone. This percentage increase is justified by the hardcover <br /> elimination in the 0-75' zone. Further, hardcover in the 250-500' zone <br /> will increase from the existing 22.8% to 60% proposed by the applicant <br /> where only 30% is normally allowed, however, a hardship is the small <br /> size of the 250-500' zone and the variance is justified by the concurrent <br /> removal of hardcover,in the 0-75' zone and general reconstruction of <br /> l�ardcover at locations further from the lake than currently exists. Overall <br /> hardcover on the properry is proposed to decrease from 5,715 s.f. <br /> (28.5%) to approximately 5,350 s.f. (26.7%), where the entire lot would <br /> normallj�be allowed 18.3% hardcover under normal hardcover limitations. <br /> 4, The City Council finds that the negative impact on room sizes and house layout <br /> and improved location of the residence in relation to lot lines as compared to the <br /> existing residence, is inadequate just�cation for granting of side setback <br /> variances. Further, the Council finds that because the existing house is being <br /> replaced with an entirely new house of different shape and design, the new house <br /> can be designed to meet the side setbacks without causing a hardship to the <br /> properry owner, and fi!rther finds no adequate hardships to justify the granting of <br /> a side setback variance. . <br /> i .. <br /> - Page 3.of 7 <br />