My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3736
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3700 - 3799 (March 11, 1996 - November 12, 1996)
>
Resolution 3736
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 2:11:32 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 2:11:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c �l <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> �e. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � F <br /> ��L; �G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . �kESH04� NO. `� '� 3 � <br /> A. The applicant proposes reduction in hardcover in the 75-250' setback area <br /> to support the improvement of the structure within the 0-75' setback area. <br /> B. The proposed improvement will not result in an increase in hardcover in <br /> the 0-75' setback area. <br /> . C. The proposed realignment of the roof will allow for improved drainage <br /> and treatment of runoff as runoff will be directed to the sides rather than <br /> directly to the lake. � <br /> D. Applicant is in the process of reducing a lakeside deck at approximately <br /> 10' x 12' to 4' x 12' completely located within the 0-75' setback area. <br /> E. The realignment and expansion of the roof will have no visual impact on <br /> • the lake views of the adjacent residences. <br /> 4. The City Coimcil finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> • Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.