My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3724
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 3700 - 3799 (March 11, 1996 - November 12, 1996)
>
Resolution 3724
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 2:08:20 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 2:08:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, , . . , <br /> � O ' V <br /> • O O <br /> b. - CITY of ORONO . <br /> � F . <br /> '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`q.t�'E Hp4�'�'� N O. s� "� � � _ <br /> � S <br /> A. The City has approved lot width and area variances for this property in <br /> 1984 and 1986. <br /> B. The size and width of the property is similar to other developed <br /> properties in the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> , C. There is no adjacent undeveloped land available to increase lot area or <br /> lot width. <br /> J�. A bluff has been located in the south yard. The proposed structure will <br /> be located 36' from the top of the bluff where the Code requires a 30' <br /> setback. <br /> E. Excavations to create a walkout will encroach 3' into the bluff impact <br /> • zone. Ceil Strauss of the DNR in a letter dated April 12, 1996 advises <br /> that the final elevations will actually slow down surface runoff providing <br /> temporary ponding and reducing potential for erosion. In her letter, Ms. <br /> � Strauss approves the proposed grading plan. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Compreherisive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the�effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> • Page 2 of 5 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).