My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#04-3047 Recorded Resolution 5254
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Circle
>
3135 Casco Circle - 20-117-23-43-0029
>
Land Use
>
04-3047, VAR
>
#04-3047 Recorded Resolution 5254
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2026 2:12:14 PM
Creation date
5/7/2026 2:12:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. _______ _ <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Mi1mesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This renewal application was reviewed as Zoning File #04-3047. The <br />original application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2936. <br />2. The property is located in the LR -1 C zoning district, which requires a <br />minimum lot area of ½ acre and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The <br />applicants' property is .49 acres and has a width of 60 feet. <br />3. The Plaiming Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on September 20, 2004 and granted approval of the renewal <br />hardcover and lake setback variance for the 0-75' zone based on the <br />following City Council findings of original 2003 application: <br />a. The nature of the property in the 0-75' zone is steep slopes being <br />supported by retaining walls. <br />b. Currently, the existing lakeshore deck is bolted to a concrete retaining <br />wall which is supporting 8' of earth. <br />c. After engineering reviews, the interdependency of the wall on the deck <br />is inconclusive; however, Council action to require removal of the <br />deck may have unintended negative consequences. Should the deck be <br />required to be removed and detached from the retaining wall, there is <br />the potential that the retaining wall may fail, subsequently causing <br />. slope failure. <br />d. The existing conditions of the retaining wall and attached deck support <br />the slope. <br />e. Absent the unique conditions noted above, the lakeshore deck would <br />normally not be allowed to remain, as it is a nonconforming structure <br />and the property is undergoing a complete teardown/rebuild of the <br />principal structure. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.