Laserfiche WebLink
.: � � ' <br /> _ � O� . <br /> O O <br /> �b - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> � G'ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �'9 4�' NO. e� p� � � �` <br /> k'E3H� <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Coinmission reviewed this application on March 18, 1996, <br /> and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following <br /> unique findings and hardships: <br /> A. The deck is deteriorating and ca�u�►ot be used by �pplicants in its ��resc►lt <br /> COriuIt101i. <br /> B. The deck will be replaced within the same footprint as the existing deck. <br /> C. In 1976 the applicants received variance approval for the existing deck <br /> that was to be located 2' closer to the lake than the deck that was <br /> constructed. <br /> D. Hardcover within the 0-75' setback area will remain at 4.04%. <br /> E. A landscape azea underlain with plastic located within the County right- <br /> of-way shall be removed. This will result in the removal of <br /> approximately 660 s.f. of hardcover. <br /> F. In a 1988 variance application, applicants removed 146 s.f. of cement <br /> patio within the 0-75' setback zone. <br /> G. During heavy rainfalls the property receives major runoff from the <br /> developed properties to the north. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hazdship or difficulty; is necessazy to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />