My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3743
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 3700 - 3799 (March 11, 1996 - November 12, 1996)
>
Resolution 3743
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 2:01:46 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 2:01:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. � <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> A. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> ��� �G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL , <br /> . `�kESH�4 NO. �Q��_ <br /> 4. The Council finds that the intensification of hardcover in the 0-75' zone by <br /> converting from a deck to an enclosed room in the 0-75' zone where hardcover <br /> akeady greatly exceeds the normal standards, would tend to make that excessive <br /> hardcover area more permanent in nature. <br /> , 5. Existing lot coverage by structures is 3,764 s.f. or 15.6% where only 15.0% is <br /> normally allowed. The proposed construction of an enclosed room for a <br /> swimming spa, which would replace an existing open deck on the property, <br /> would result in an increase in lot coverage to 16.7%. <br /> 6. The Council finds that the properiy as it currently exists contains the maximum <br /> amount of enclosed structure that the property can support without creating <br /> negative visual impacts as viewed from the lake. <br /> • 7. The Council finds that no adequate hardship has been presented by the <br /> applicants to support the request for an increase in the lot coverage by structures <br /> on the properly, when the property already exceeds the standard allowance for <br /> lot coverage. <br /> 8. The applicants stated medical need for the addition is not considered a valid <br /> hardship to the property, but is merely a hardship to this specific applicant. <br /> 9. Granting the required variances would be contrary to the provisions of Municipal <br /> Zoning Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3(A) with which the applicants must <br /> first comply in order that variances be granted. The Council finds that: <br /> A. The properly in question can indeed be put to reasonable use if used <br /> under conditions allowed by the official controls. The properly contains <br /> a single family residence with many existing amenities. <br /> B. The plight of the applicants is not created by circumstances unique to <br /> their property but is merely created by the applicants desire to create an <br /> additional amenity on the property. <br /> • Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.