Laserfiche WebLink
- � � �11�' - <br /> O o <br /> ��. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � ti� <br /> ��� ��' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 9kESH0g'� NO. � 7 Jr g <br /> B. Applicant further proposes to reconstruct and construct a new roof over <br /> the existing gazage and proposed addition, such new roof being steeper <br /> in pitch than the existing roof, and portions of it constituting new <br /> structure in locations not meeting the required setbacks from the street <br /> and side property boundaries. <br /> �. The existing gazage doors open towazd the street, making the existing <br /> garage nonconforming because a gazage with doors facing the street is <br /> required by code to be setback 30' from the street lot line. <br /> D. It would be inappropriate to construct the magnitude of additions <br /> proposed while continuing the direct access to the street (Casco Circle), <br /> which currently forces parking to occur within the street right-of-way <br /> where such parking is generally discouraged or disallowed by Municipal <br /> Zoning Code Sections 8.20 and 10.61, Subdivisions 4 and 5. <br /> E. Applicant has agreed to eliminate the garage stall doors facing the street <br /> and has agreed to place such doors on the east side of the <br /> existing/proposed garage structure, and to develop a driveway apron <br /> within the property boundaries to accommodate maneuvering and parking <br /> outside of the right-of-way. <br /> F. The proposed addition located as neaz as 7.4' from the side lot line will <br /> have no significant impact on neighboring property or on the <br /> neighborhood. Raising the pitch of the roof over the existing/proposed <br /> garage located only 0.2' from the street lot line and as near as 4.4' from <br /> the side lot line, will have no negative impact on the neighboring <br /> property owner or the neighborhood, since there are other similazly <br /> situated detached garages in the neighborhood. <br /> G. Planning Commission finds that the reconfiguration of the garage stalls <br /> to enter the east side of the garage, and the concurrent construction of a <br /> new driveway/pazking area to the east of the garage structure, will have <br /> minimal hazdcover impact and will not cause a nonconforming hazdcover <br /> problem, but will result in hazdcover in the 75-250' zone at a level less <br /> than 20%, where 25% hazdcover would be allowable. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />