Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Thiesse asked how the front line is defined. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it would be the narrower of the two street frontages. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted there is no way he would ever be able to construct a driveway in that area. Thiesse asked if <br />anything would change if it was defined otherwise. <br /> <br />Curtis stated with respect to the requests he is making today, he would still need to meet the 30-foot <br />setbacks. <br /> <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted for discussion purposes that the porch is a clean slate and that it should be in conformance <br />if at all possible. Thiesse asked if the one foot relates to the fire code. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it relates to the massing and that they do meet the fire code required separation. <br /> <br />Schwingler stated in his view it is a great addition. <br /> <br />Leskinen moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3851, Peter <br />Bluth, 2413 Carman Street, granting of side and rear setback variances and a structure-to- <br />structure setback variance, subject to Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />