Laserfiche WebLink
� o� <br /> � o 0 <br /> ��e. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � ' ti . <br /> '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL <br /> ��`qkE p4�'G NO. � � � � <br /> � SH , <br /> C. The Environmental Protection Goals on page 3-20 state that"Lake shorelines <br /> will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will <br /> be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface <br /> runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear cutting will be <br /> prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap <br /> shoreline protection will be encouraged." . <br /> 8. The City of Orono has on past occasions relied on these and other principals <br /> contained within the Comprehensive Plan, to deny land alteration conditional use <br /> permits and specifically, variances for grading within the 0-75' lakeshore setback <br /> zone, in cases where excavation and lowering of the natural lakeshore grades was <br /> proposed in order to allow the creation of a walkout residence,for instance. The City <br /> has long taken the position that such excavations create an artificial and unnatural <br /> lakeshore appearance. � <br /> • 9. � The existing blufF proposed to be excavated has the appearance of a natural feature <br /> on the landscape. The State archeologist has given an opinion that this is a natural <br /> remnant glacial feature and likely is not dredge spoil. The Council finds that the <br /> alteration of this bluff as proposed would be inconsistent with the goals and policies <br /> in the Comprehensive Plan generally and as noted specifically above. <br /> 10. The applicants have suggested that the property area and configuration are such that <br /> the proposed use can only be accomplished if hardcover variances are approved. The <br /> City Council finds that this fact is not a hardship to the property, but is clear <br /> indication that this portion of the property is not suitable for the proposed use as a <br /> parking lot. <br /> � 11. Applicants have indicated that safety is a concern and should be considered a <br /> justification for granting the variances. The Council fmds that the underlying reason <br /> for this variance request is the overdevelopment of the dockage system on Tanager <br /> Lake. In 1989 the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District approved an expansion <br /> from the pre-existing 25 slips on Tanager Lake to 64 slips, an increase of 39 slips. <br /> The LMCD approved this increase without apparent consideration of the ability of <br /> the land base to support such an increase in intensity of use. Municipal Zoning Code <br /> . Section 10.41, Subdivision 8(E) states that required parking spaces may not be <br /> • Page 4 of 8 <br />