My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road South
>
760 Brown Road South - 03-117-23-43-0004
>
Land Use
>
86-1050, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2026 11:33:54 AM
Creation date
4/17/2026 11:33:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KINUTES OF TBE RRGULALR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINC, HELD JULY 28. 1966 <br />7%Rl oso S'dO " R. aRaM <br />0 slow ROAD swim <br />VARIAMCR <br />R398OLUTION #2027 <br />Thomas R. Browne was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a f ront yard setback variance to construct an addition <br />to replace an existing porch and construct an attached <br />garage. He noted that applicant is changing the <br />driveway aczess layout which staff finds acceptable. <br />Planning Commission recommended approval. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by <br />Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution 12027 approving <br />the variance as presented. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br /># 10 5 8 BTIY= SCMMMLY <br />2555 COUNTRYSIDs DRIP! <br />VARIAN" <br />KNOOLUTION # 2029 <br />Steven Schnebly was present for this scatter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request <br />for after -the -fact variances to permit the construction <br />of masonry walls flanking his driveway entrance which <br />exceed the 42" maximum height allowance a.id require a <br />variance because they are structure within a front yard <br />a.-ta . <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the <br />Planning Commission voted 3-2 to approve the request, <br />with the minority opinion being that a similar type of <br />structure was recently disapproved on Brackett's Point <br />(Pillsbury serpentine wall) and approval of the <br />Countryside Drive application would be inconsistent. <br />Staff differentiates this application from the Pillsbury <br />application in that it is essentially two pillars rather <br />than a continuous wall. <br />In respor..ie to the question by Mayor Butler, Mr. <br />Schnebly stated that he did not plan to put anything on <br />top of the entrance pillars. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by <br />Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2028 granting <br />the after -the -fact variances as presented. Motion, Ayes <br />3, Nays 0. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.