My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road South
>
920 Brown Road South - 10-117-23-12-0002
>
Land Use
>
05-3102, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2026 1:27:12 PM
Creation date
4/16/2026 1:23:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#05-3102 920 Brown Rd. S. <br />May 12, 2005 <br />Page3 <br />Structural Coverage: <br />Total Lot Area <br />40,400 s.f. (0.93 ac.) <br />Total Structural Coverage <br />Allowed: 6,060s.f. (15.0 %) <br />Initial Proposal: 3,463 s.f. (8.6 %) <br />Revised Plan: 3,714 s.f. (9.2 %) <br />Hardcover Calculations: <br />Hardcover Total Area Allowed Existing Revised <br />Zone in Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br />0-75' 3,220 s.f. 0% (to be removed) 0 s.f. (0%) <br />75-250' 21,825 s.f. 5,456 s.f. (25 %) (to be removed) 2,498 s.f. (11.4 %) <br />250-500' 15,340 s.f. 4,602 s.f. (30%) (to be removed) 4,294 s.f. (28.0 %) <br />Totals 40,385 s.f. 10,058 sf (to be removed) 6,792 s.f. <br />Hardship Statement & Analysis <br />(Refer to comments from April 14 Memo) <br />Summary of Issues for Consideration <br />1. Is the existing lot size sufficient hardship to support granting of the lot area and width <br />variances? <br />2. Are there hardships present that support granting of the side setback variances? Is the <br />50' wide buildable envelope so limiting as to be considered a hardship? <br />3. Would granting of the north side setback variance of 12' be appropriate in the context <br />of this neighborhood and the locations of neighboring homes? Is the impact of <br />additional structure length while requiring less side setback encroachment, a positive <br />or negative for the neighborhood? <br />4. Are there any other issues with this proposed rebuild?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.