My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road South
>
920 Brown Road South - 10-117-23-12-0002
>
Land Use
>
05-3102, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2026 1:27:12 PM
Creation date
4/16/2026 1:23:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, April 18, 2005 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#05-3102 J. Sven Gustafson, Continued) <br />these homes is reduced to 70 feet. The applicants have indicated that the zoning when applied to this <br />property makes it unbuildable for a home that would be proportionate with other homes in the <br />neighborhood and in character with the style of home that is currently being built as Orono's rural area re- <br />develops. The width of the ren1aining bui1dable envelope is 50 feet when the 30-foot side setbacks are <br />met. Gaffron noted many substantial homes no wider than 50 feet are being built today on smaller lots in <br />---orono and tlfartnesiciesetoaclcfcoula-15e resolvea through creative cfosigi1iatfier than variances. <br />Gaffron stated the proposed site grading plan have the existing driveway remaining. The existing <br />driveway is less than the required five feet from the side lot line, but its relocation slightly northward to <br />meet the five-foot requirement would result in the removal of two mature aspen trees abutting the north <br />side of the driveway. The topography of the site also limits the driveway relocation. <br />Staff recommends approval of the lot area and width variances and denial of the side setback variances. <br />Alexander stated Exhibit H illustrates the size of the lot compared to the smTounding lots and that the <br />hardship is the size of the lot. Alexander stated normally lots consisting of one acre have ten-foot side <br />yard setbacks and requested some leniency be given due to the size of the lot. <br />Alexander stated the terrain and the approach to the house makes it difficult to access the residence and <br />have a turnaround. Alexander indicated there is not sufficient room to construct a side-loading garage. <br />Gustafson indicated they are attempting to construct a house that fits in with the character of the <br />neighborhood and that the size of the proposed house fits in with the rest of the residences that have been <br />constructed in this area. Gustafson stated other 55-foot houses have been constructed on small lots along <br />the lakeshore. <br />Alexander noted the allowed structural coverage is 15 percent and that they are only using 7 .5 percent. <br />Ralm inquired whether there were any public conm1ents regarding this application. <br />David Skeie, 860 South Brown, stated the existing house is 24.5 feet from the side lot line and that he <br />would prefer it not be reduced further. <br />Gustafson stated the neighbor to the south has indicated he is in favor of the proposal. <br />Fritzler questioned whether the connection of the sewer line to tie in with Weber Hills could be <br />accomplished. <br />Gaffron stated he is unaware if the Public Works Department has approached the County regarding this <br />request, but that it would be a simple extension to the sewer system and would more than likely be <br />approved by the county. <br />PAGE 19
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.