My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road South
>
920 Brown Road South - 10-117-23-12-0002
>
Land Use
>
05-3102, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2026 1:27:12 PM
Creation date
4/16/2026 1:23:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TlIE _____ _ <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday,June26,2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. #05-3102 STONEWOOD DESIGN BUILD, 920 BROWN ROAD SOUTH, Continued) <br />White noted the encroachment is being doubled and that the Planning Commission should review this <br />item again. <br />Sansevere concurred with sending the application back to the Planning Commission given the changes. <br />Peterson stated in her view there have been significant changes to the plans. <br />Alexander stated part of the reason for the confusion is the way the resolution reads and that the <br />resolution does not cite specific house plans. Alexander stated she interpreted it to mean that as long as <br />they conformed with the setback variance, they were fine. <br />Gustafson stated the resolution reads any amendments that are not in conformance with city code. <br />Peterson stated in her view they are intensifying the approval. <br />Sansevere suggested any future questions be directed to Mr. Gaffron. <br />Gaffron stated this application would be on the July Planning Commission agenda. <br />Brokl noted the variance that was granted has already expired so it would need to go back to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Gustafson stated they were told if they applied for a building permit it would be okay. <br />Brokl stated the building permit would have been issued based on the site plan that was approved. <br />Gaffron inquired whether a renewal variance application should be brought. <br />Brokl stated a new application should be submitted. <br />The City Council referred this application to the Planning Commission. <br />5. #05-3131 STEVE BOHL OF BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., 190 WILLOW DRIVE <br />NORTH AND 177 GLENDALE DRIVE -RPUD/FINAL PLAT/REZONING -RESOLUTION <br />NO. 5480 AND ORDINANCE NO. 34, TIDRD SERIES <br />Mark Gronberg, Surveyor, and Chris Pearson, Attorney-at-Law, were present. <br />Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting final plat approval for Glendale Cove. Gaffron stated the <br />applicant is requesting approval of an ordinance for rezoning the property, except for the church lot, from <br />RR-lB Rural Residential District to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District; the PUD No. <br />5 Agreement, which establishes the ongoing conditions of PUD approval as well as providing for the <br />installation of improvements; and a resolution granting general development plan approval and final plat <br />approval. The approvals are conditioned on the developer following the "Ecological Restoration & <br />Management Program for Glendale Cove" by AES, Inc. Although the covenants have not been received <br />from the applicant as of yet, Staff will confirm upon receipt that they contain language requiring ongoing <br />management of the common spaces in conformance with the AES program. Staff is expecting that the <br />PAGE 5 of9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.