Laserfiche WebLink
Ma~ 15 05 02:29p Kath~ Alexander 952-473-8222 <br />May 13, 2005 <br />To Mike Gaffron & the Planning Commission - <br />I regret that I am not able to be at the planning commission meeting on the 16 th and wanted to <br />re-cap some of the thought process in the design of 920 South Brown Road. <br />It is a very small lot in the area in comparison to the lots surrounding it. The need for lot size and <br />~idth variances alone stand strong to represent a hardship in needing consideration for a side yard <br />variance. In my 18 years of working in cities in the Minneapolis area -this hardship alone has gotten <br />sideyard setback variances granted in many other communities. <br />I would ask you again to give careful consideration to smaller side yard setbacks that would be <br />, proportionate to the lot. <br />In re-considering t11e design for a house at 920 S. Brown Road, I have walked the lot and looked <br />at the two neighboring houses , views and lay of the land. The house itself is design~ to stay small. <br />The prospective buyers are empty nesters and want a compact footprint -2118 sq. ft.-with a . <br />main floor Master Bedroom. This will be a one level home with a walkout basement. The real <br />issue is -where does the garage go if it is to attach to the house? The buyers would really prefer <br />an angled garage to minimize its protrusion to the front and side. This wilJ not work without <br />15 ft. side yards. The landscape dictates that a tuck under will not work. A front facing garage <br />would cover more than 50% of U1e face of the house and trulv look like a tract home on a <br />beautiful piece of la1id. An L-shaped garage will work but al~o may overpower the house <br />depending on how set back from the house it can be. It also dictates that the garage must be kept <br />on the north side of the lot due lo the grnde of the land and driveway. This appears to be the best <br />solution based on city requirements. <br />I would ask you to consider granting a variance on one side of the lot to 18 IL instead of the normal <br />30 ft. required in this zone. Since the lot itself and the lot width require variances in order <br />to even pull a building pennit, this seems like a logical & fair variance lo grant based on the <br />hardship of the small lot in a 2 acre zone. <br />Thank you for your time & attention to this matter. <br />Sincerely <br />p.2 <br />RESIDENTIAL BUILDING DESIGN <br />Kathryn Alexander <br />401 EAST LA.KE STREET <br />W.AVZATA, MN 55391 <br />... <br />(952) 473-8777