Laserfiche WebLink
LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Section 78-420. 78-1434, 78-1435, 78-1438 -Setbacks: <br />RR-1B Required Existing <br />Front 50' Home 220' <br />Rear 50' Home ±55' <br />North Side 30' Home 28.6' <br />East Side 30' Home 40.7' <br />West Side 30' Home ±220' <br />South Side 30' Home ±340' <br />Wetland 35' Home 34.5' <br />Separation between 10' n/a buildings <br />Section 78-420 -lot Area/Width· <br />RR -1B Lot Area Lot Width <br />Requ ired 87 ,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' <br />Proposed <br />FILE #16-3872 <br />12 Oct 16 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Home 220' <br />Barn 175' <br />Home ±55' <br />Barn ±160' <br />Home 28.6' <br />Barn 30' <br />Home 40.7' <br />Barn 170' <br />Home ±220' <br />Barn 132' <br />Home ±340' <br />Barn ±365' <br />Home 34.5' <br />Barn 151' <br />Hou se to Barn = 36' <br />Actual 102,550 s.f. (2.5 acres) 100' @ cul-de-sac/+300@ 50' setback <br />Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: <br />The property exceeds 1.99 acre s in area therefore structural coverage limits do not apply. <br />Section 78-1434 -OAS (Area Restrictions): <br />The property is 2 .5 acre s in area . A si ngle oversized accessory structure (OAS) up t o a 1,200 <br />square foot footprint is permitted . <br />Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: <br />The property is exempt from the Stormwater Quality Overlay Di strict ha rdcover limitations. <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Setback Variance (Sect ions 78-1434 & 78-1435) <br />The applicants are proposing to construct an OAS closer to the street than the principal <br />structure. A variance is required . <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123} <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed varian ce upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipate d traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public s afety, and the effect <br />on values of property in t h e s urrounding area. The Planning Commission s hall co nsider <br />re co mmending approval for variances from the literal provis ion s of the Zo ning Co d e in in stances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficu lties b ecause of circumstances unique