Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />SITS: EVALUATION REPORT <br />FOR MR. RAY HECK <br />LCT 1, BLOCK 1 FOX RID3E <br />August 25, 1982 <br />Cn August 24-25, 1982 three percolation holes were tested <br />and two soil borings taken on the above lot to determine anoth- <br />er drainfield site to replace a failing one that presently ex- <br />ists. The present site sits in a low area with a high water ta- <br />ble and is also susceptable to holding runoff water from adjoin- <br />ing slopes. There was some higher ground to the east which we <br />looked at but decided that the good area was limited and quite <br />a few trees would have to home out along with poor access to <br />the site. Thus, we chose an area to the west of the house where <br />the soil was fairly good and access better. However, the exis- <br />ting well is fairly close which will have to be missed by at ' <br />least 50 feet with the new drainfield. <br />All testing was done in accordance with the provisions of <br />the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for IndiviC':8l Sewage <br />Treatment Systems. The percolation holes were dug 3.5 feet deep <br />and 6 inches in diameter, while the soil borings were dug 6 in- <br />ches in diameter to the 4 foot depth and 3 inches in diameter <br />to the remaining depth. The percolation holes yielded an aver- <br />age percolation rate of 221.7 minutes per inch whi^h is accep- <br />table for a s• adard system:. There is mottled soil at 5.5 feet <br />just under the sand layer whicl, would require that the trench- <br />es be at a maximwr. depth of 2.5 feet. <br />Additional system design, inforr,.ticn follows. 11' any otht'.- <br />information is needed, ple:;.se contact me. <br />S: ncerc]y-, <br />J1FaCCR, ItiC. <br />�!C O <br />1:,.rk Gront,(.rp-,, i .E. <br />