Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1930 <br />May 11, 1994 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant proposes construction of a new residence on Lot 1 of the Byfield plat. The <br />footprint of the residence is shown at 1900 s.f. with an attached two-stall garage at 575 s.f. <br />Applicant's architect, Clark Engler, has advised that the actual residence to be constructed will <br />be smaller than the 1900 s.f. footprint as the footprint shown on the site plan and survey is the <br />approximate footprint of Mrs. Cost's existing residence in Plymouth. Mr. Engler was the <br />architect who designed the original home and will design the new residence for Mrs. Cost. No <br />elevations or floor plans are proposed but photos of her existing residence have been provided. <br />Natural materials and colors that blend in with the environment are planned similar to the <br />earthtone colors used in the contemporary design of the existing residence (Exhibit K, color <br />photos, will be viewed at meeting). The north side of the house facing the Luce Line will be <br />one story, long and low to ground. The lower level will have a walkout to the south. <br />Although the property consists of 5 acres, 3 acres are wet and the remaining 2 acres are <br />limited by bluff and steep slopes and a protected tributary that requires more restrictive setback <br />standards than were in effect in 1980. When the Byfield plat was approved, the setback for <br />structures was only 26'. Note non-structural hardcover can be located within the 7 5-100' <br />setback area from the tributary. <br />The applicant met with the Orono and DNR staffs at the site to discuss possible need for <br />fencing to eliminate trespassing on property at the northern boundaries adjacent to the tributary <br />and Luce Line. Staff discouraged applicant from installing a fence as fencing soon becomes an <br />attractive nuisance. The applicant was encouraged to contact police when the trespassing became <br />objectionable. She was advised to put up no trespassing signage advising people of private <br />property and the DNR would put up their standard signage advising of the limits of the trail. <br />Staff has discussed the encroachment of the driveway within the bluff impact zone noting <br />that there is adequate area to meet a 5' setback from the side south lot line and meet the 20' <br />setback from the defined top of the bluff. <br />When the Byfield plat was approved by the City, a shared access was encouraged by both <br />the County and the City. Upon the sale of the property to the current owner, the original <br />developer asked the City and the County to allow a separate access for Lot 1 to allow Lot 2 to <br />retain the existing access. This request was approved by both the County and the City. It is <br />the applicant's desire to also maintain her own drive because of the potential of liability when <br />dealing with a shared drive. The applicant is meeting with a representative of Hennepin County <br />DOT on Wednesday, May 11, to review the realigned curb cut. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Review Exhibits B and C.