My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3974
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3900 - 3999 (May 12, 1997 - November 10, 1997)
>
Resolution 3974
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 12:50:16 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 12:50:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�:..'� F <br /> '1.�• . � <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> � �b� - CITY of ORONO <br /> � �. <br /> ti <br /> ��� ��'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . `�h'Esxo4 No. � 9 '7 4 <br /> . A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES <br /> TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.22, SUBD. 1 AND 2 AND SECTION 10.25, SUBD. 6(B) <br /> � FILE NO. 2287 <br /> WHEREAS, Bradley and Traci Peterson (hereinafter "the applicants") are <br /> owners of the property located at 1770 Shadywood Road witlun the City of Orono (hereinafter <br /> "the City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 18, Shady-Wood (hereinafter "the property"); and - . <br /> WI�REAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal <br /> Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subd.l and 2 and Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) to permit the <br /> replacement of a previously existing 490.2 s.f. deck. <br /> !' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2287. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore Residential <br /> Zoning District requiring one-half acre in area. The properiy consists of <br /> 12,047.9 s.f. or .28 acres. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 15, � <br /> 1997 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the <br /> following findings: <br /> 1. The zoning lot does not meet area or width requirements. <br /> 2. The deck is a replacement for a previously existing one. � . <br /> `• Page 1 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.